![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Geez
it's getting difficult to believe this is still America
still think this guy was a fake or nutcase?(read the January 2001 predictions at the bottom... it's not just that he predicted things, it's the way he presented it)
yep, a WACO-type event every other month or so, culminating in civil war against a governmental-enacted police state... then we move onto WW3.
Start packing your bags and be ready to leave before 2008.
still think this guy was a fake or nutcase?(read the January 2001 predictions at the bottom... it's not just that he predicted things, it's the way he presented it)
yep, a WACO-type event every other month or so, culminating in civil war against a governmental-enacted police state... then we move onto WW3.
Start packing your bags and be ready to leave before 2008.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yes. Yes I do.
no subject
1) I've read the entire site and haven't seen some of quotes Mrdark mentions. This makes me suspect.
2) his understanding of the theory of time travel as espoused by Mr Titor is inaccurate. If you're going to debate something, you'd better fully understand what you are arguing against.
It didn't help that I followed his links and discovered that he's not only a raving conservative, he is an ardent religious conservative that seems to believe this country should be run accordint to the bible.
I don't really BELIEVE John Titor... but I don't buy this argument either. My point was that what Titor had to say was relevant whether or not you BELIEVE he was who he said he was.
no subject
I read the whole thing and it just made me tired thinking about trying to talk sense to someone like that. Knowing me, though, I probably will attempt it on my own LJ sometime in the future *groan*
ARRRGH
no subject
Taken as fiction, it's good scifi which begs the discussion of right, true, and fiction. Specifically: I'd argue that it is fiction, it's truth is unlikely, but that it is right .. of course my politics and his are too well-aligned ;)
Still reading through ..
no subject
i would have written your comment last night, but i was too damn tired.
to be honest, i think that the question of whether he actually comes from the future or not is moot, because what he writes isn't any more or less likely to be true than any other situation that imaginative writers can think up for us about our immediate future. I'd argue that it is fiction, it's truth is unlikely, but that it is right .. which makes the advise he gives for surviving "the crazy years" good advice for any way the situation falls out.
can i trust you with my life?
no subject
I hope so. I also hope you have better to lean on. We should take this off of cass' LJ, no?
no subject
sure... but this seems to be the topic of ongoing conversation for us, anyway. :-)
no subject
Unsurprisingly, I am taking it rather seriously. I'll read up on it and tell you what I think privately when I get home.
Hoax.
Physicists speak (http://communities.anomalies.net/cgi-bin/bbs/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=9&t=000040&p=10) - scroll down a bit to Pamela's August 14, 2001 02:45 entry
Re: Hoax.
Was JT a TT? Dunno and don't care.
oh and maybe I'm blind but
Frankly, my biggest skepticism comes from the fact that he didn't name anyone for anything. What? He couldn't even remember a "future" president's name? What would have been so hard about recounting that simple fact? Shoot, even telling people who would be governor of Florida would have been helpful to his case.... as for changing the future, what would have telling (not even) a hundred people have hurt?